Any pastors who are reading, have you ever stopped to listen, really listen, to the women in your church about how they feel treated or perceived? I want to emphasize that while this way of interacting between genders doesn’t happen all the time everywhere, it does happen a lot of the time in a lot of different churches, enough to stop and consider what kind of environment your church is for the single women in it.
In Part 1 of this series, we explored what beyond sexual relationships is left for relationships between men and women in the church. We see there is quite a bit, though you wouldn’t always know it in conservative evangelical churches. In Part 2, I talked about the need to practice the discipline of seeing past a woman’s looks to the image bearer underneath. I think many leaders in the Church don’t understand the harm done to a woman who loves God who is regularly seen as a temptation and threat simply because she is beautiful. In this post, I want to explore a particularly ugly tendency in male/female relationships in the Church, how women perceived as “desperate” are treated in the Church.
I am a diehard Clemson Tiger fan. I love our dear coach’s recent response to a reporter’s question about the term “clemsoning,” which the press used to mean when our Tigers fall apart and self-destruct, something that had happened on a big stage in several games years before. He said something along the lines, “I don’t even know why you use that term.” And he went on to put it to rest. That’s not a word we use. That’s not a concept we consider. Our team plays their guts out to the bitter end, and the National Championship game in which Clemson scored with 12 seconds left in the game proved that.
In similar form, the evangelical Church needs to purposefully put away the concept of “desperate” women. It’s not that there are never situations in which you could use the term, but the term is unhelpful in every way to discipling women in healthy identities or facilitating brotherly, phileo love between the genders. As much as I don’t like the term and would like to simply shut down any discussion on it as Dabo did with clemsoning, I will at least give the general context in which it gets used.
In the Church, a desperate woman may be widowed, but more likely she is divorced or has never been married. She is perceived as not being sufficient in herself and looking for a man, any man, who can meet her needs physically and emotionally. Men avoid her because they think she’ll take any kindness from them and misconstrue it as interest in a relationship.
Are there believing women who aren’t secure in their identity in Christ? No, actually, there aren’t. There is NO woman in Christ who is not secure in her identity in Christ. Now, she may not FEEL that security, but her place in Him is more secure than Fort Knox. She doesn’t need a man (though it is a blessing when God gives such a relationship), and even women in our churches who don’t yet understand their security in Christ still have that as their spiritual reality. If a woman doesn’t live in the reality of her security in Christ, church leaders should disciple her in it, never reinforce her feelings of insecurity. When a pastor or ministry leader perceives a woman as desperate, they will treat her like she is instead of calling her to walk in confidence in Christ. They will reinforce her feelings of insecurity instead of drawing her to see all she has as a daughter of the King of Kings.
Furthermore, there are a lot of mature single women in the Church, particularly those getting older in their singleness, who ARE secure in their identity in Christ. But men in their churches still often perceive them as desperate and treat them in really offensive ways.