The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Providence College
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/General Assembly/PCA General Assembly/BCO 25-3 Amendment Defeated; Not Approved By Requisite Number of PCA Presbyteries

BCO 25-3 Amendment Defeated; Not Approved By Requisite Number of PCA Presbyteries

The Amendment failed since it did not receive the required approval of two-thirds of the Presbyteries.

Written by Dominic Aquila | Tuesday, February 20, 2018

The GA approved the amendment and sent it to the Presbyteries; the BCO requires that amendments be approved by two-thirds of its Presbytery. It is now clear from an unofficial tabulation of the Presbyteries that have voted, that 30 Presbyteries have voted against approving the amendment, which means that the two-thirds requirement cannot be met.

The 45th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America, at its meeting in June 2017, approved an amendment to its Book of Church Order (BCO) 25-3, and sent it to its eighty-six Presbyteries for approval. The amendment to BCO 25-3 proposed requiring a special and a larger quorum, increasing it to 50% of resident communicant members, for congregational meetings if they were voting to consider withdrawing from the PCA.

The amendment added one sentence at the end of the present provision so that it would have read (the amendment is underlined):

The quorum of the congregational meeting shall consist of one-fourth (1/4) of the resident communing members, if the church has not more than one hundred (100) such members, and of one-sixth (1/6) of the resident communing members if a church has more than one hundred (100) such members. However, at any meeting where there will be a vote to withdraw from the Presbyterian Church in America, the quorum shall be one-half (1/2) of the resident communing members.

The GA approved the amendment and sent it to the Presbyteries; the BCO requires that amendments be approved by two-thirds of the Presbyteries. It is now clear that after an unofficial tabulation of the Presbyteries that have voted, that 30 Presbyteries voted not to approve the amendment, which means that the two-thirds requirement cannot be met.

Supporters of the amendment argued that the General assembly approved sending the amendment to the Presbyteries by a vote of 706-183, which was a significant vote. They also argued that the present provision of the BCO would allow as few as 9% of the voting members of a congregation to approve withdrawing from the PCA. Thus, the Assembly’s recommended change was intended to assure that any action to withdraw would be a more accurate reflection of the mind of a greater number of the congregation, not just a small minority. As presented by the supporters, the amendment’s intent was simply to insure that it was really a greater number of the congregation, not just a small minority of the church, that would approve withdrawing from the PCA.

Opponents of the amendment argued that to require a quorum of 50% of the resident communicant members was excessive. A quorum sets the baseline number of members required to conduct business. Amendment proponents apparently assumed that the lower quorum for congregation meetings in the present provision would be the total number of the members present and voting. However, for a congregation meeting considering whether to withdraw from the PCA, opponents argued that many more members would be present than just the bare minimum required by the quorum.

They also argued that the PCA had chosen to make withdrawing from the PCA a matter for each local congregation to consider on its own without interference from any higher court of the church. The PCA had purposefully adopted a non-hierarchical form of Presbyterian polity, and as such it saw its commitment to this grassroots system, as stated in BCO 25-10, as a solemn covenant between the local churches and the PCA.  And they argued further, that the amendment requiring an untenable quorum, was seen as a means of the PCA restricting and impinging on the right of local congregations with regard to their ecclesiastical affiliation.  Thus the amendment was seen as contrary to the letter and spirit of the principles embedded in the BCO. While the amendment was a seemly slight one, it carried significant implications that would begin to erode foundational PCA principles, which could produce unintended consequences in the future.

Dominic Aquila is a minister in the Presbyterian Church in America and is Editor of The Aquila Report.

Related Posts:

  • Reasons for PCA Presbyteries to Vote NO on Amending…
  • Top 50 Stories on The Aquila Report for 2018: 31-40
  • Just Vote NO on the Proposed Amendment to BCO 25-11
  • Reasons for PCA Presbyteries to Vote NO on Amending…
  • Savannah River - 2nd Presbytery to Request the 48th…

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Freedom to Enjoy - A new book by Cindy Taylor - Feasting Responsibly on the Wagon Train of Life for the Glory of God, 
 -- Who Gives us All Things to Enjoy

Archives

Books

Geerhardus Vos: Reformed Biblical Theologian, Confessional Presbyterian - by Danny Olinger

Special

A Golden Chain
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donations
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Important:

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Special

5 Solas of the Reformation
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts
Providence Christian College - visit

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2021 The Aquila Report · Log in